The question
Gold vs S&P 500 — same $500/month?
Same $500/month contribution schedule in gold and the S&P 500 since 2015 — ending values side by side. Not a forecast; historical reality check.
Quick answer
If you invested $100/month into Gold from 2015-01-02 through 2026-09-04, total contributions would have been about $14,079 and a blind DCA portfolio would be worth about $28,144 (+99.9%) on this historical path — before fees and taxes.
Assumptions
What this page actually assumes
- Identical monthly contributions into gold and the S&P 500.
- Start year defaults to 2015; chips let you restart later and drop earlier history on purpose.
- No fees, taxes, or currency FX beyond what is embedded in the price series.
Historical data
2015-01-02 → 2026-09-04
Both series use the same SteadyGrow market window. This is a head-to-head habit comparison, not an argument that gold “should” beat equities or vice versa.
Series: Gold and S&P 500. Same contribution calendar. No data before 2015.
Interactive simulation
Change the habit, stay on the real curve
$100/month · Gold
2015-01-02 → 2026-09-04 · $100/month · Gold
Contributed$14,079Held to the last date$28,144Return+99.9%Gold2015-01-02 → 2026-09-04 · $100/month+$14,065 vs cash inEnded $28,144 on $14,079 contributedPortfolio (DCA)Cash contributed$100/month · S&P 500
Same $500/month into the S&P 500
2015-01-02 → 2026-09-04 · $100/month · S&P 500
Contributed$14,079Held to the last date$27,134Return+92.7%S&P 5002015-01-02 → 2026-09-04 · $100/month+$13,055 vs cash inEnded $27,134 on $14,079 contributedPortfolio (DCA)Cash contributedResults
What the numbers say
Read ending value and total contributed first. Risk is not the same: drawdowns, recoveries, and volatility differ even when the cash schedule matches.
The chart marks portfolio value over time for fixed-amount DCA and (when shown) a same-capital lump sum. Contributed cash rises in steps; ending value is mark-to-market on the last date (2026-09-04).
What changes if…
How did we calculate this?
- Window: real market history from our published backtest bundle, typically from 2015 through the latest Friday in the series — we do not invent older decades.
- Contribution calendar: the engine runs on a weekly Friday grid. A “monthly” habit is converted to an equivalent weekly cash rate ((amount × 12) / 52) so the same engine can compare habits.
- Purchase timing: each period’s contribution is applied on that week’s bar in the series (close-based weekly path), not an intraday open fill.
- Assets: S&P 500, Bitcoin, and other series we publish — USD only. No FX conversion.
- Shares: fractional units are assumed. No brokerage commissions, bid–ask, or slippage are modeled.
- Dividends / income: returns follow the wealth path in the backtest bundle for that asset (not a fixed 7–10% toy rate).
- Lump sum (when shown): the same total cash as the DCA habit, invested on day one of the window, then marked to the same path.
Frequently asked questions
- Gold vs S&P 500 — same $500/month?
- From 2015-01-02 to 2026-09-04, $100/month into Gold contributed about $14,079 and a blind DCA habit ended near $28,144 (+99.9%).
- Are these numbers a forecast?
- No. They replay published market history from 2015 onward. Future returns can look nothing like this window.
- What assumptions matter most?
- Start date, contribution size, weekly vs monthly cadence, and whether you held through drawdowns. Fees and taxes are not modeled.
- Can I change the amount or start year?
- Yes — use the chips on this page when available, or open a related what-if / calculator with a different habit.
- How is this different from a 7% compound calculator?
- Fixed-rate toys assume a smooth return. We mark contributions to a real index/crypto path, including crashes in the window.
- What if I had traded instead?
- See The Boring Alternative for story-shaped counterfactuals (options losses, round-trips), then run the same dollars through an index DCA calculator.
Run a related reality check
Same contribution schedule, different assets — or a fixed-rate planning calculator when you want an illustration instead of history.
What if?