The Boring Alternative · Trading disasters

What if those part-time earnings had been boring instead?

Editorial rewrite of a public young-trader post describing a ~$13,000 loss of part-time earnings — versus S&P 500 DCA of the same capital over one year.

Based on a real public Reddit case (r/wallstreetbets). We rewrote the facts — we did not copy the post. Source

  1. What happened

    $13k — everything from a part-time job

    A public post described trying to get rich while juggling school and life stress, then finishing with about a $13,000 loss — framed as everything earned from a part-time job. Small numbers still count when they are all of someone’s savings.

  2. The boring alternative

    Same capital → S&P 500 DCA from 2025-01-03

    We take $13,000 and spread it as equal weekly buys through 2026-08-28, then hold. That matches “invested periodically,” not a 15-minute options trade. Assumptions that are ours (round numbers, start dates) are called out above.

    S&P 500$13,000 deployed · 2025-01-03 → 2026-08-28
     +$2,752 vs blind (+17.8%)Ended +17.8%
    Blind DCASteadyGrow
    $0$4,744$9,489$14.2k$19k2025-012025-052025-082026-012026-052026-08

  3. The difference

    Trading path vs boring path

    Trading outcome (stated)-$13,000
    Left from that path$0
    Boring alternative (index value)$15,496
    Wealth vs $0 left$15,496

    Vs the stated trading P&L of -$13,000, the boring ending value is a $28,496 swing in wealth outcomes — not a prediction of your next trade.

    Blind DCA contributed ~$13,000. SteadyGrow sizing on the same budget ends near $18,247.

  4. Lesson

    What this is (and isn't)

    “Get rich” is the opposite of boring. Thirteen thousand dollars of real wages on an index habit is still a what-if worth seeing.

  5. More counterfactuals

    Nearby stories

Run your own scenario

Pick an amount and start year on our calculators — or follow weekly signals when you want the habit without the same-size blind buy every week.

Open the simulatorWhat if? library →