What if · since 2018 · Gold

What if I invested $100 every month in Gold since 2018?

How much would $100 monthly into Gold since 2018 be worth? Blind DCA vs adaptive contributions.

How much would this DCA have been worth?

If you invested $100/month on a monthly budget (simulated as a weekly-equivalent cash rate) into Gold from 2018-01-05 through 2026-09-04, your total contributions would have been about $10,455 and a blind dollar-cost averaging portfolio would be worth about $24,129 (+130.8%) on this historical path — before fees, taxes, or changing the habit mid-stream.

2018-01-052026-09-04

$100/month · Monthly DCA · Gold

Contributed$10,455
Blind DCA value$24,129
Return+130.8%
SteadyGrow value$22,449
vs blind DCA$-1,680
Lump sum (same capital)$34,192
Gold2018-01-05 → 2026-09-04 · $100/month
 $-1,680 vs blind (-7.0%)Ended -7.0%
Blind DCASteadyGrow
$0$7,206$14.4k$21.6k$28.8k2018-012019-102021-072023-032024-122026-09

What does the chart show?

The chart marks portfolio value over time for blind DCA, SteadyGrow sizing, and (when shown) a same-capital lump sum. Contributed cash rises in steps; ending value is mark-to-market on the last date. Blind DCA ends about $1,680 ahead of SteadyGrow on this window — adaptive sizing is not a guarantee.

How did we calculate this?

  • Window: real market history from our published backtest bundle, typically from 2015 through the latest Friday in the series — we do not invent older decades.
  • Contribution calendar: the engine runs on a weekly Friday grid. A “monthly” habit is converted to an equivalent weekly cash rate ((amount × 12) / 52) so the same engine can compare habits.
  • Purchase timing: each period’s contribution is applied on that week’s bar in the series (close-based weekly path), not an intraday open fill.
  • Assets: S&P 500, Bitcoin, and other series we publish — USD only. No FX conversion.
  • Shares: fractional units are assumed. No brokerage commissions, bid–ask, or slippage are modeled.
  • Dividends / income: returns follow the wealth path in the backtest bundle for that asset (not a fixed 7–10% toy rate).
  • Blind DCA vs SteadyGrow: blind buys the same cash every period; SteadyGrow keeps the same long-run budget but sizes weeks from the model’s multipliers.
  • Lump sum (when shown): the same total cash as the DCA habit, invested on day one of the window, then marked to the same path.

Frequently asked questions

How much would $100/month DCA into Gold have been worth?
On this page’s window (2018-01-05 → 2026-09-04), blind DCA contributed about $10,455 and ended near $24,129. Change the calculator or a related what-if story for other amounts and start years.
Is this a forecast or a historical backtest?
Historical only. We replay published prices from 2015 onward. Past paths do not predict future returns.
Do you include dividends, fees, and taxes?
We use the asset’s backtest wealth path (USD) and assume fractional shares with no brokerage fees. Taxes and account wrappers are not modeled — treat the result as a pre-tax illustration.
How do monthly contributions work in a weekly engine?
A monthly dollar amount is converted to a weekly-equivalent cash rate so it can run on the same Friday grid as our other calculators. It is not twelve identical calendar-month fills.
What is the difference between blind DCA and SteadyGrow?
Blind DCA deploys the same cash every period. SteadyGrow keeps a similar long-term contribution budget but sizes individual weeks using the model — more when valuation/regime looks cheaper, less when stretched.
Can I compare DCA to investing everything at once?
Yes — open the DCA vs lump sum calculator. It uses the same total cash: one lump on day one versus spreading buys across the window.
Where can I learn the basics before I run a calculator?
Start with our DCA guides — what DCA is, vs lump sum, weekly vs monthly, and crash behavior — then jump back into a historical calculator.

What if your contribution wasn't always the same?

Blind DCA deploys $100/month every period. SteadyGrow keeps the same long-term habit but sizes weeks from valuation and regime — more when markets are cheap, less when they're stretched.